Skip directly to site content Skip directly to page options Skip directly to A-Z link Skip directly to A-Z link Skip directly to A-Z link
Volume 30, Number 3—March 2024
Dispatch

Bedaquiline Resistance after Effective Treatment of Multidrug-Resistant Tuberculosis, Namibia

Gunar GüntherComments to Author , Lusia Mhuulu, Azaria Diergaardt, Viola Dreyer, Maria Moses, Kaarna Anyolo, Nunurai Ruswa, Mareli Claassens, Stefan Niemann1, and Emmanuel Nepolo1
Author affiliations: Inselspital Bern, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland (G. Günther); University of Namibia, Windhoek, Namibia (G. Günther, L. Mhuulu, A. Diergaardt, M. Claassens, S. Niemann, E. Nepolo); Katutura State Hospital, Windhoek, Namibia (G. Günther, M. Moses, K. Anyolo); Research Center Borstel, Borstel, Germany (V. Dreyer, S. Niemann); German Center for Infection Research, Partner Site Hamburg-Lübeck-Borstel-Riems, Borstel (V. Dreyer, S. Niemann); National Tuberculosis and Leprosy Programme, Windhoek, Namibia (N. Ruswa)

Main Article

Figure 2

Timeline for a case of tuberculosis in a patient in Namibia whose infection became drug resistant after effective treatment. The case was originally diagnosed and treated beginning in December 2021. Interruptions in treatment were caused by stockout. Second-line drugs were not used. Full detailed treatment history is unknown. The patient sought care in Namibia in September 2022; we diagnosed MDR TB in October 2022. Treatment failed and rv0678 mutation was identified in a culture from June 2023. A) Patient’s treatment history. Green bars represent treatment of drug-susceptible TB; blue bars represent treatment of MDR TB. B) Evolution of phenotypic and genotypic drug susceptibility testing with resistance-associated variants using Deeplex Myc TB (https://www.deeplex.com). Testing was done at time of diagnosis of MDR TB and after culture reversion. Bold text de novo indicates mutations. Months show time of specimen collection. C) Culture and smear test results. Asterisks indicate that tests were not done because of stockouts. Months show time of specimen collection. Dagger indicates start of MDR TB treatment. AMI, amikacin; BDQ, bedaquiline; CFZ, clofazimine; CS, cycloserine; DS, drug-susceptible; EMB, ethambutol; FQ, fluoroquinolones; INH, isoniazid; LIN, linezolid; LFX, levofloxacin; MDR, multidrug-resistant; ND, not done; PYR, pyrazinamide; R, resistant; RIF, rifampin; S, susceptible; TB, tuberculosis; WT, wild type.

Figure 2. Timeline for a case of tuberculosis in a patient in Namibia whose infection became drug resistant after effective treatment. The case was originally diagnosed and treated beginning in December 2021. Interruptions in treatment were caused by stockout. Second-line drugs were not used. Full detailed treatment history is unknown. The patient sought care in Namibia in September 2022; we diagnosed MDR TB in October 2022. Treatment failed and rv0678 mutation was identified in a culture from June 2023. A) Patient’s treatment history. Green bars represent treatment of drug-susceptible TB; blue bars represent treatment of MDR TB. B) Evolution of phenotypic and genotypic drug susceptibility testing with resistance-associated variants using Deeplex Myc TB (https://www.deeplex.com). Testing was done at time of diagnosis of MDR TB and after culture reversion. Bold text de novo indicates mutations. Months show time of specimen collection. C) Culture and smear test results. Asterisks indicate that tests were not done because of stockouts. Months show time of specimen collection. Dagger indicates start of MDR TB treatment. AMI, amikacin; BDQ, bedaquiline; CFZ, clofazimine; CS, cycloserine; DS, drug-susceptible; EMB, ethambutol; FQ, fluoroquinolones; INH, isoniazid; LIN, linezolid; LFX, levofloxacin; MDR, multidrug-resistant; ND, not done; PYR, pyrazinamide; R, resistant; RIF, rifampin; S, susceptible; TB, tuberculosis; WT, wild type.

Main Article

1These authors contributed equally to this article.

Page created: February 08, 2024
Page updated: February 22, 2024
Page reviewed: February 22, 2024
The conclusions, findings, and opinions expressed by authors contributing to this journal do not necessarily reflect the official position of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, the Public Health Service, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, or the authors' affiliated institutions. Use of trade names is for identification only and does not imply endorsement by any of the groups named above.
file_external